http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/G1X/G1XA.HTM
Canon G1 X versus Sony NEX-5N at base ISO Canon G1 X at ISO 100 Sony NEX-5N at ISO 100 We expected a different result pitting the 16-megapixel NEX-5N against the 14.1-megapixel G1 X, but the G1 X looks sharper overall. The Movie Digest videos are stored by the camera, and at the end of a day's shooting, are automatically stitched together into a single video showing all of the day's clips in sequence
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1080919-REG/canon_9543b001_powershot_sx60_hs_digital.html#!
The SX60 also combines a 16.1-megapixel High Sensitivity CMOS sensor and the DIGIC 6 image processor to create the Canon HS SYSTEM, allowing for accurate colors and fine detail to be captured in low-light conditions. 65x Optical Zoom Lens Featuring a versatile 35mm equivalent focal length of 21-1,365mm, the 65x optical zoom lens allows users to work in an extraordinary range of shooting conditions
Canon PowerShot SX60 HS review - CNET
http://www.cnet.com/products/canon-powershot-sx60-hs/#!
It's joined by a programmable shortcut button that's been relocated from the other side of the camera, making it much easier to quickly change something like the light metering or white-balance settings without looking at the controls. It doesn't give you much control -- just zoom, self-timer, shutter release, and flash (assuming you've popped it up) -- but it's nice to have for shooting wildlife and group portraits
http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/canon_powershot_sx50_hs_review/comments/
Bottom line: the Canon is a bit smaller and lighter, cheaper, has a long, long telephoto (not important for me), but a much slower lens, and it would appear noticeably sharper and cleaner image quality. MY ADVICE-Shooting sports, knocking it around- SX50 Remember that they get to that long zoom by using a small sensor, but it does work and the RAW shots are workable
http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_PowerShot_SX50_HS/verdict.shtml
In terms of image qualiy, there's little to choose between these two models, and now that the SX50 HS can shoot RAW, we can say that applies to both the in-camera JPEGS as well as RAW files. That, plus the addition of RAW modes and other improvements add up to a highly capable and well balanced model highly deserving of the Cameralabs Highly Recommended award
NIkon P900 vs Sony HX400 vs Canon SX60 HS
http://www.cameradebate.com/2015/nikon-p900-vs-sony-hx400v-vs-canon-sx60-hs/
I personally thought that Nikon would have to use even a smaller sensor to feature this mind blowing zoom, and I'm happy that it's the same size as the P610. This includes the biggest zoom range among the three cameras with the best optical stabilization mechanism, allowing up to 5-stop shutter speed compensation
http://www.cameradebate.com/2014/canon-powershot-sx510-hs-vs-nikon-coolpix-l830-vs-nikon-coolpix-p530/
That's why some people prefer going with a camera with less zoom but better optical performance at the tele-end instead with a very big zoom which can lead to softer images at the tele-end. Nikon Coolpix L830 sample video Image quality is very good, but you can see the barrel distortion at the wide angle, but overall it capture nice videos that you can share with your friends
http://thenewcamera.com/fujifilm-x-s1-vs-canon-sx40-hs-vs-nikon-p500/
Similarly as canon, Fuji features high optical performance glass lens elements (aspherical, high refractive index, and ED glass lenses) make the exceptional brightness of F2.8 at wide angle and F5.6 at telephoto possible. Disclaimer: We have attempted to select useful information to include on New Camera, and to ensure that the resources we have included on the site -- as well as the way we have described them -- are accurate, fair, and balanced
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs SX40 - Our Analysis
http://snapsort.com/compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX50-HS-vs-Canon-SX40
Has any one had both? Can you share your experience? And what about the sony 300 super zoom? Does any other brand come close? Is a carl zeiss lens worth all that? bi (1:39 AM, November 01, 2013) How come sx50 is cheaper? Sx40 is cheaper on Amazon Nicole68 (11:43 PM, September 16, 2013) Which is a better camera? Sx40 or sx50? Justin Chia (2:43 PM, June 22, 2013) Not sure how they come up with 315 shots for SX 40 HS. I understand many of the shots were intuitive such as the re peat capture action mode, where you are blind to what is happening while the shots are captured
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs Nikon P510 - Our Analysis
http://snapsort.com/compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX50-HS-vs-Nikon-P510
Oops Peter (10:56 AM, November 09, 2012) Nikon bias!I don't see how Nikon P510! Clearly someone who gets paid for Nikon wrote the Nikon P510 review.You haven't metioned these cons of the Nikon P510The screen only goes up and down, it does not rotate.The focus is very slow at 42x zoomIt has GPS which pushes the price up for no reason and drains the batteryYou need to update your old dated reviews. All other cameras gave colors distortion, Fuji (not raw) especially.GPS actually was helpful when I was on resort in Cuba and tagged all "wild" travel, snorkeling and scuba locations
No comments:
Post a Comment