Wednesday 22 July 2015

Max column name length in sql server 2005

Top sites by search query "max column name length in sql server 2005"

  http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/42764/Regular-Expressions-in-MS-SQL-Server
User-defined table-valued functions require the implementation of two public static methods: one is the master method that is called by MS SQL Server and returns an objects enumeration (IEnumerable), and the other is the secondary method that is called by the first to fill the table rows. This includes situations such as: Performing complex calculations (that have to be expressed using procedural logic) on a per-row basis over values stored in database tables

  http://aboutsqlserver.com/2014/12/02/size-does-matter-10-ways-to-reduce-the-database-size-and-improve-performance-in-sql-server/
Lastly, there is always the option of creating another table on another filegroup, copying data there and dropping original table and renaming the new table afterwards. Do you really need to store the time when order was placed with up to 3-millisecond precision provided by datetime column (8 bytes)? If this was not the case, you could use 1-second precision of datetime2(0) type (6 bytes)

SQL Server Forums - Multiple REPLACE statements on one column


  http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=55592
Is there a way to base a replace statement off of another table of values? I'm thinking I could just keep adding values to the table and re-run the statement to continually update the field. Just take a look again.I have a table name newsletter and a coloumn name Catg having the values g0,g1,g2,g3 ....g54.i want to replace the above values of g0 with general, g1 with medical, g2 with social, g3 with science

Geeks With Blogs


  http://geekswithblogs.net/johnsperfblog/archive/2008/04/16/ntext-vs-nvarcharmax-in-sql-2005.aspx
By default NTEXT stores the text value in the LOB structure and the table structure just holds a pointer to the location in the LOB where the text lives. I converted one column at a time and a simple select query which took 4 secs on the unchanged table still took 4s until I had changed all the columns using ntext to nvarchar, and then it came down to 3secs avg

  http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2012/05/01/sql-server-maximum-allowable-length-of-characters-for-temp-objects-is-116-guest-post-by-balmukund-lakhani/
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Email (required) (Address never made public) Name (required) Website You are commenting using your WordPress.com account

  http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/08/09/sql-server-2005-list-all-the-column-with-specific-data-types/
However, after reading your post, the same idea applied to the variables used inside the code would also be nice, since the main purpose is to replace old or deprecated data types with new or enhanced ones. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Email (required) (Address never made public) Name (required) Website You are commenting using your WordPress.com account

  http://www.bigresource.com/MS_SQL--is-too-long-Maximum-length-is-128-Error--1K9LDtyR.html
View Replies View Related Maximum Length Of Return In Query Analyzer I am executing a SELECT statement that has about 500 characters of literal characters concatenated with the contents of a field from a table. ??? Maximum Row Length Of A Column Maximum Length Of An Expression Maximum Length Sql Statement That Can Be Run In SQL CE RS2005: Export To Excel Error: Destination Array Was Not Long Enough

SQL Server search for a column by name - Stack Overflow


  http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3761673/sql-server-search-for-a-column-by-name
Is there a way to easily search for columns in the database and return just the table name that the column belongs to? I found this, but that also returns Stored procedures with that column name in it..

Work around SQL Server maximum columns limit 1024 and 8kb record size - Stack Overflow


  http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14070932/work-around-sql-server-maximum-columns-limit-1024-and-8kb-record-size
When I am trying to update any column after the 310th (where as all starting 309 columns having some value) it gives error: Cannot create a row of size 8061 which is greater than the allowable maximum row size of 8060. If there are likely to be frequent queries on many rows of row-overflow data, consider normalizing the table so that some columns are moved to another table

No comments:

Post a Comment