Clarifying LEFT and RIGHT in the defintion of a PARTITION FUNCTION in SQL Server 2005 - Kimberly L. Tripp
http://www.sqlskills.com/blogs/kimberly/clarifying-left-and-right-in-the-defintion-of-a-partition-function-in-sql-server-2005/
If November 1 comes around and you want the data for October to be added to your partitioned table and you ONLY want to show the most four months, then you will need to add October and remove June. I cannot use this column for referential integrity unless I create a composite unique key (not index) on that guid column and the datetime column again
http://www.toadworld.com/platforms/sql-server/w/wiki/10238.built-in-functions-string-functions
In transactional systems you might have to format the string accepted on a user-interface screen; in reporting situations you might need to concatenate or compare strings. This function can be considered as a special case of CAST or CONVERT functions, both of which let you convert the variable from one data type into another compatible datatype
http://www.sommarskog.se/arrays-in-sql-2008.html
(In case you are thinking that XML or delimited strings could be an alternative here, permit me to point out that they, too, represent intermediate storage. One is the push model, where you create a rowset with the metadata, fill the rowset with your data, and in the regular parameter area, you pass the rowset pointer
http://www.sommarskog.se/arrays-in-sql-2005.html
Either because you already have the data in a table, as in the case of table-valued parameters, or you skip the table entirely as you do with dynamic SQL or when you use many parameters. As I discussed above in the section Inline, Multi-Statement and Temp Tables, inline T-SQL functions gives the optimizer a degree of freedom which is not really good for its health
http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/16385/whats-the-difference-between-a-temp-table-and-table-variable-in-sql-server
The compile time table cardinality is stored in the plan and if the statement is executed again with the same cardinality (either due to flow of control statements or reuse of a cached plan) no recompile occurs. As a side bar, recompiles with Temp Tables can occur with the addition of data and whether the DDL for the temp table is interlaced with the DML or not
http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/03/15/sql-server-dbcc-reseed-table-identity-value-reset-table-identity/
DBCC CHECKIDENT (yourtable, reseed, 34) If table has to start with an identity of 1 with the next insert then table should be reseeded with the identity to 0. but if there is no connectivity they will enter the data into the local serve within the district and this data will be updated to the Central server whenever the connection establishes
http://www.sqlteam.com/article/sql-server-2008-table-valued-parameters
While a VB.Net developer recently informed me that there is a SQLBulkCopy object available in .Net to send multiple rows of data to SQL Server at once, the data still can not be passed to a stored proc.Possibly the most anticipated T-SQL feature of SQL Server 2008 is the new Table-Valued Parameters. When multiple rows of data to SQL Server need to send multiple rows of data to SQL Server, developers either had to send one row at a time or come up with other workarounds to meet requirements
Comparing Inline and Multi-Statement Table-Valued Functions - SQLServerCentral
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/blogs/discussionofsqlserver/2012/02/15/comparing-inline-and-multistatement-table-valued-functions/
(The total elapsed time is related to how long it takes to return the information to the client, so I disregard this value.) Since the function is being called 6 times, the table variable is built, populated, and then read from 6 times, hence the value of 6. But how many reads were being performed against the Employees table? We know that the function is accessing the Employees table, but we have no clue as to what the IO statistics are for that table
http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/UploadFile/898089/how-to-create-scalar-value-function-in-sql-server-2012/
A Statement that creates another scalar - valued function Here we create a user-defined (Scalar-valued function) which finds the name of a vendor using vendorid. Reader Level: Article How to Create Scalar Value Function in SQL Server 2012 By Vipendra Verma on Aug 27, 2012 function in sql server, Scalar Value Function, sql server 2012, user define function, In this article I am going to explain how to create scalar value functions in SQL Server 2012
http://beyondrelational.com/modules/2/blogs/77/posts/11288/table-valued-parameters-to-a-table-valued-function-underappreciated-features-of-microsoft-sql-server.aspx
There are tons of benefits, and there can be nothing better than the list provided by MSDN: Do not acquire locks for the initial population of data from a client Provide a simple programming model Enable you to include complex business logic in a single routine Reduce round trips to the server Can have a table structure of different cardinality Are strongly typed Enable the client to specify sort order and unique keys Do you use user defined table data types? If yes, how do you find this feature? Do let us know! Until we meet next time, Be courteous. You can use table-valued parameters to send multiple rows of data to a Transact-SQL statement or a routine, such as a stored procedure or function, without creating a temporary table or many parameters
permissions - Workaround for calling table-valued function remotely in SQL Server has even more issues - Stack Overflow
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10982360/workaround-for-calling-table-valued-function-remotely-in-sql-server-has-even-mor
I'm not sure why I'm getting this error, because the mapping exists for my username, and if I simply replace the table-valued function with an actual table, it returns the results fine. Unfortunately, the call fails on the linked server with the error: Msg 4122, Level 16, State 1, Line 29 Remote table-valued function calls are not allowed
sql - Multi-statement Table Valued Function vs Inline Table Valued Function - Stack Overflow
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2554333/multi-statement-table-valued-function-vs-inline-table-valued-function
As a general rule of thumb we have found that where possible inline table valued functions should be used in preference to multi-statement ones (when the UDF will be used as part of an outer query) due to these potential performance issues. In a large query, the optimizer would not be able to take advantage of other types of joins as it would need to call the function for each customerId passed
Use Table-Valued Functions as Arrays in SQL Server - CodeProject
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/17802/Use-Table-Valued-Functions-as-Arrays-in-SQL-Server
Although you can't put a list of values in one parameter, you can use one parameter per value: SELECT * FROM table WHERE field IN ( @Param0 , @Param1 ) So if you know how many values to expect there's no trouble using parameters with IN. Check out these results below: Test Project (1000 Iterations) - T-SQL 17 min 20 sec 765 ms - CLR 0 min 3 sec 453 ms As you can see, the difference is drastic
http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2009/09/23/sql-server-insert-values-of-stored-procedure-in-table-use-table-valued-function/
I strongly recommend using this kind of table-value UDFs as they are faster than the alternative you have shown and can also be a much faster alternative to views and nested queries in a huge number of cases. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Email (required) (Address never made public) Name (required) Website You are commenting using your WordPress.com account
Using Table-Valued Functions in SQL Server - CodeProject
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/167399/Using-Table-Valued-Functions-in-SQL-Server
At my spare time (what ever that actually means) I'm also teaching and consulting on different areas of database management, development and database oriented software design. When Creating a Table Valued Function in Management Studio The easiest way to start creating a table valued function (well, actually any function or procedure) is to use SQL Server Management Studio and start creating an anonymous T-SQL block
No comments:
Post a Comment